Mayan ethnozoology of pre-Columbian Guatemala, Mexico, Belize, Honduras, and Costa Rica.

Ethno-zoology is the study of animals, insects, etc of a particular culture, usually an indigenous culture in a non-Western society. Ethno-zoology (which can also be correctly spelled as ethnozoology) is part of ethnography, which is the study of any particular culture somewhere in the world (usually non-Western). Occasionally this specialization is called “zooarchaeology” but FLAAR is more interested in iconography, epigraphy, and ethno-zoology. The archaeological aspects are only the route to seeing which birds, bees and other creatures were important to the Classic Maya.

Stingle bee. Domesticate nest of the Scaptotrigona Genera, from San Marcos Guatemala. The people of the village used the honey as medicine to treat different afections or for flavoring uses. Photo by Nicholas Hellmuth FLAAR photo archive.	Cople of green iguana (Iguana iguana) from the Natural Reserve of Monterrico, Santa Rosa, Guatemala. Photo by Nicholas Hellmuth FLAAR photo archive.

Ethnozology and ethnobotany, as  key aspects of ethnography, hence are crucial parts of anthropology. FLAAR is interested in the anthropology of pre-hispanic cultures of Latin America. In order to be realistic in how much we can cover, we tend to study the anthroplogy of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica.

Mesoamerica is the part of Latin America that was occupied or significantly influenced by either the Olmec or their successors or neighbors: the Maya, Teotihuacan empire, Toltecs, or Aztecs (Nahua and Nahuatl speakers). In terms of modern locations we are speaking of Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Costa Rica. Parts of Nicaragua were also influenced but most “Mesoamericansts” tend to concentrate on the first six countries.

This is primarily Central America and Central Mexico (75% of Mexico is technically still part of North America; Central America begins at the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, which is in Oaxaca. So Mexico is part of Latin America, but is definitely not “South American” and only about a third is “Central American” (Chiapas, probably most of Tabasco, Yucatan, Quintana Roo; I am writing this without access to a map).

While on definitions, archaeology is the study of the anthropology of past cultures. Iconography is the study of the representational artistic symbols of a culture. Epigraphy is the study of any writing system (though usually of a so-called hieroglyphic writing system).

Cokroach painting in Maya bowl rollout. Photo by Nicholas Hellmuth, From The Museo Popol Vuh, Franciasco Marroquin University, Guatemala

There is not a recognized concept of “ethno-geology” but this would be the study of minerals, clays, etc that are of interest or utility to a particular culture. For the Maya these would be primarily obsidian, jadeite, cinnabar, flint (chert actually), and iron pyrite (not used as a metal but as a mirror-like utilitarian and ritual accessory).

FLAAR is engaged in aspects of all of this. Our contributes are primarily in field research (because our office is in Guatemala) and in imaging (because FLAAR is considered a world leader in digital photography, scanning, and printing technologies). It is difficult for scholars in Europe and the US to maintain a full-time research center physically in Latin America. It is unrealistic for even museums and universities nowadays to keep up with advances in digital imaging to record artifacts, architectural history, botanical and zoological specimens. So FLAAR makes its knowledge available in full-color PDFs so that students, scholars, and interested lay people can learn from our projects and experiences.

We are especially devoted to providing definitions, glossary, and helping students understand the meaning of the jargon in prehispanic Mesoamerican ethnography, ethnology, and anthropology.

This particular page is an introduction to the aspects of ethnozoology that FLAAR has a long-time history and long range future interest in.
Insects

• Cochinal insects as source of red coloring material
• Beetles that are pictured clearly in Maya art on Tepeu 1 bowls from Peten
• Bees
• Ants
• Lightning bugs
• Butterflies
• Centipedes

Scorpions
Spiders

• (Spiders of interest to the Maya)
• (Unusual, photogenic, or otherwise worth of interest today)

Iguanas,
Snakes,
Shellfish,
Lland snails
Shells as origin of dye
Shells as jewelry
Fish

• Sharks (shark teeth)
• Marine fish
• Fresh water fish

Frogs, toads
Turtles

• Turtles as food
• Turtle carapaces as musical instruments
• Turtle as birth location of Maize God with Hero Twins attending

Crocodiles
Felines
Peccaries: in diet, art, astronomy (iconography and epigraphy)
Deer
Bats

• Vampire bats
• Other bats

Birds

• Raptors,
• Hummingbirds,
• Birds related to water,
• Doves,

Other mammals

Moving forward in studies of Mayan ethnozoology

First step: itenize all creatures listed in Popol Vuh, Chilam Balam, and other scared Maya texts.

Second step: list all creatures included in astronomy or mythology other than the major texts, as pictured in art (murals, stelae, ceramics, flints, obsidians, shell carvings, etc).

Third step: all other creatures pictured in any way in Maya art.

Here are two zoological representations in Mayan bowls in different artistics manifestations: one bowl has the form of a turtle and at the right it is an armadillo painting.

Fourth step: all creatures whose remains (skeletons or otherwise) are found in caches, burials, or even garbage deposits from ancient times.

Firth: list all creatures that are spectacular appearance or zoological importance today, and question why these were not singled out by pre-Columbian inhabitants.

It is equally crucial to prepare bibliographies, especially of capable scholars in Guatemala, Mexico, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador, and Costa Rica as well as scholars part and present in the rest of the world. One I would mention as an example would be the prior work on animals in the Maya world by Sofia Paredes of La Ruta Maya Foundation.

First posted Sept. 25, 2008